Our results suggest that retracted research does indeed creep into policy literature frequently, perhaps even as much as non-retracted research – but it does so unevenly.

A retraction typically consists of two published items: the retracted article, and the retraction notice (RN) in which the decision to retract the article is formally announced in the journal.

Again, false statements were more likely to be asked to be retracted, and retraction was more likely to be seen as mandatory, when the context was public than when it was private.

Some retracted cancer papers continue to accrue positive (i.e., supporting) citations, although these tend to wane after the second year, and dip to near-zero citations after about a decade ...

The main contribution of this study is in expanding our knowledge about the subjective experience of researchers whose paper was retracted and its devastating implications.

As shown in Examples 6 and 7, this move exposes a questionable record or back-ground of the retracted article(s) (e.g., correction or expression of concern) and/or the article author(s), hinting...

Our analysis showed that retracted articles originating from the United States were mostly retracted because of duplication/manipulation of images as well as falsification/ fabrication of data.

Given its extensive collection of retracted chapter information, complete with full bibliographic details and original text links, and its capability to support one-click data export, this study...

ow scientific fraud can affect medical practice is reported by Avenell et al. (2019). After assessing the citations of 12 retracted clinical trial reports in 68 systematic reviews, meta-analyses...

Evolution of retracted publications in the medical sciences: citations analysis, bibliometrics, and altmetrics trends