Jul 21, 2016 · Once that happens, code will resume execution at the "catch". If there is a breakpoint within a function that's evaluated as part of a "when", that breakpoint will suspend …

I want to know if I can safely write catch () only to catch all System.Exception types. Or do I've to stick to catch (Exception) to accomplish this. I know for other exception types (e.g.

I think that this only works if you raise and then catch the exception, but not if you try getting the traceback before raising an exception object that you create, which you might want to do in …

If you re-throw an exception within the catch block, and that exception is caught inside of another catch block, everything executes according to the documentation.

Putting a return in a catch block might be hard to read because you expect the return to bypass the finally statement. The same could be said of putting a return block in the try block. Return …

Apr 14, 2014 · This is my first time writing transaction, is it correct/best practice to have the TRY/CATCH block inside the transaction or should the transaction be inside the TRY block?

Sep 27, 2008 · One related and confusing thing to know is that in a try- [catch]-finally structure, a finally block may throw an exception and if so, any exception thrown by the try or catch block …

Feb 15, 2012 · 0 1.we can use the try block without catch but we should use the catch/finally, any one of them. 2.We can't use only try block.

May 19, 2009 · Well, the question is "Why catch and rethrow Exception in C#?", and this is an answer. =] ...and even with specialized exceptions, Exception Filters make sense: consider the …

In the second case, use catch (Exception) if you want to catch that type or derived types of exceptions, but don't want to know the details. Otherwise you'll get a warning and declare a …